Dear True--- please post these links on True North and the attached URGENT articles and call to arms here in Minnesota and nationwide. My editorial that printed in the duluth trib on monday is below as is another one from St. Cloud on what's happening elsewhere. It is crucial that we stop this from a human rights standpoint. THANK YOU.
Also, Let's get folks to sign the teenscreen petition. TeenScreen Petition: Over 20,500 signatures: http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?TScreen
Video: TeenScreen - A National Fraud: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfU9puZQKBY__________________________________________________
Please get the word out to all your Minnesota friends about the legislation to fund TeenScreen / mental health screening of kids there.
Minnesota legislators are considering a bill to fund TeenScreen to the tune of 2.2 million dollars. Please contact everyone you know so they can contact everyone they know and in this way we may be able to alert a bunch of Minnesota folks. Please do this now.
Otherwise, you may have TeenScreen at your own doorstep next.
Duluth News Tribune (Minnesota)
April 02, 2007
Program to prevent teen suicide misguided
I am a parent concerned about a new program being considered by the Minnesota Legislature, the so-called “TeenScreen” suicide-prevention program (HF 196 and SF 789).
While promoted as a suicide-prevention program, its implementation likely would not prevent suicides, but actually could result in more suicides and also in the mislabeling of children with mental disorders and in the placement of children on dangerous, mind-altering psychiatric drugs.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has found no evidence that screening for suicide risk reduces suicide attempts or mortality. On that score, funding TeenScreen would be a waste of state tax dollars.
Most important, those found to be at risk after an initial screening would be referred to a psychiatrist. This is particularly distressing as the data released by a survey, printed in JAM Academy Adolescent Psychiatry in 2002, showed that nine of 10 children who see a psychiatrist are given psychiatric drugs. This is most dangerous as the FDA has found that antidepressants play a causal role in pediatric suicides, and that children given psychiatric drugs are twice as likely to commit suicide as those given a placebo. Witness the fact that all school shootings have been linked to psychiatric drugs. As a result, the FDA has ordered drug manufacturers to place a black-box warning on antidepressant labels. The black-box warning is the most serious measure the FDA can take regarding a prescription medication, short of an outright ban.
While preventing suicide is a noble goal and any suicide is a needless loss, TeenScreen, drugs and psychiatrists are not the mechanisms to achieve that aim.
Bev Miller
Grand Marais
Please read the below and then send an e-mail to the Chairman of the Montana Senate Finance and Claims Committee and bcc the rest of the committee members. Tell them NO on Resolution 27 which they will be hearing tomorrow, April 5, 2007. You can find the resolution here: http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2007/billhtml/SJ0027.htm You could even send them the link to the BMJ article below.
The resolution simply is an attempt to to implement the plan of the "New Freedom Commission" which recommended TeenScreen and also TMAP (read below) The commission recommended comprehensive mental health screening for "consumers of all ages," including preschool children. Schools, wrote the commission, are in a key position to screen our 52 million students. Many states are now working on the recommendations of the NFC to "transform" the mental health system. You can read more about the NFC here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Freedom_Commission_on_Mental_Health
Any questions, comments or coordination, please contact Steve Pearce cchrseattle@aol.com
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7454/1458
British Medical Journal
19 June 2004
Bush plans to screen whole US population for mental illness
Jeanne Lenzer
New York
A sweeping mental health initiative will be unveiled by President George W Bush in July. The plan promises to integrate mentally ill patients fully into the community by providing "services in the community, rather than institutions," according to a March 2004 progress report entitled New Freedom Initiative (www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/newfreedom/toc-2004.html). While some praise the plan's goals, others say it protects the profits of drug companies at the expense of the public.
Bush established the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health in April 2002 to conduct a "comprehensive study of the United States mental health service delivery system." The commission issued its recommendations in July 2003. Bush instructed more than 25 federal agencies to develop an implementation plan based on those recommendations.
The president's commission found that "despite their prevalence, mental disorders often go undiagnosed" and recommended comprehensive mental health screening for "consumers of all ages," including preschool children. According to the commission, "Each year, young children are expelled from preschools and childcare facilities for severely disruptive behaviours and emotional disorders." Schools, wrote the commission, are in a "key position" to screen the 52 million students and 6 million adults who work at the schools.
The commission also recommended "Linkage [of screening] with treatment and supports" including "state-of-the-art treatments" using "specific medications for specific conditions." The commission commended the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) as a "model" medication treatment plan that "illustrates an evidence-based practice that results in better consumer outcomes."
Dr Darrel Regier, director of research at the American Psychiatric Association (APA), lauded the president's initiative and the Texas project model saying, "What's nice about TMAP is that this is a logical plan based on efficacy data from clinical trials."
He said the association has called for increased funding for implementation of the overall plan.
But the Texas project, which promotes the use of newer, more expensive antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs, sparked off controversy when Allen Jones, an employee of the Pennsylvania Office of the Inspector General, revealed that key officials with influence over the medication plan in his state received money and perks from drug companies with a stake in the medication algorithm (15 May, p1153). He was sacked this week for speaking to the BMJ and the New York Times.
The Texas project started in 1995 as an alliance of individuals from the pharmaceutical industry, the University of Texas, and the mental health and corrections systems of Texas. The project was funded by a Robert Wood Johnson grant—and by several drug companies.
Mr Jones told the BMJ that the same "political/pharmaceutical alliance" that generated the Texas project was behind the recommendations of the New Freedom Commission, which, according to his whistleblower report, were "poised to consolidate the TMAP effort into a comprehensive national policy to treat mental illness with expensive, patented medications of questionable benefit and deadly side effects, and to force private insurers to pick up more of the tab" (http://psychrights.org/Drugs/AllenJonesTMAPJanuary20.pdf).
Larry D Sasich, research associate with Public Citizen in Washington, DC, told the BMJ that studies in both the United States and Great Britain suggest that "using the older drugs first makes sense. There's nothing in the labeling of the newer atypical antipsychotic drugs that suggests they are superior in efficacy to haloperidol [an older "typical" antipsychotic]. There has to be an enormous amount of unnecessary expenditures for the newer drugs."
Drug companies have contributed three times more to the campaign of George Bush, seen here campaigning in Florida, than to that of his rival John Kerry
Olanzapine (trade name Zyprexa), one of the atypical antipsychotic drugs recommended as a first line drug in the Texas algorithm, grossed $4.28bn (£2.35bn; 3.56bn) worldwide in 2003 and is Eli Lilly's top selling drug. A 2003 New York Times article by Gardiner Harris reported that 70% of olanzapine sales are paid for by government agencies, such as Medicare and Medicaid.
Eli Lilly, manufacturer of olanzapine, has multiple ties to the Bush administration. George Bush Sr was a member of Lilly's board of directors and Bush Jr appointed Lilly's chief executive officer, Sidney Taurel, to a seat on the Homeland Security Council. Lilly made $1.6m in political contributions in 2000—82% of which went to Bush and the Republican Party.
Jones points out that the companies that helped to start up the Texas project have been, and still are, big contributors to the election funds of George W Bush. In addition, some members of the New Freedom Commission have served on advisory boards for these same companies, while others have direct ties to the Texas Medication Algorithm Project.
Bush was the governor of Texas during the development of the Texas project, and, during his 2000 presidential campaign, he boasted of his support for the project and the fact that the legislation he passed expanded Medicaid coverage of psychotropic drugs.
Bush is the clear front runner when it comes to drug company contributions. According to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), manufacturers of drugs and health products have contributed $764 274 to the 2004 Bush campaign through their political action committees and employees—far outstripping the $149 400 given to his chief rival, John Kerry, by 26 April.
Drug companies have fared exceedingly well under the Bush administration, according to the centre's spokesperson, Steven Weiss.
The commission's recommendation for increased screening has also been questioned. Robert Whitaker, journalist and author of Mad in America, says that while increased screening "may seem defensible," it could also be seen as "fishing for customers," and that exorbitant spending on new drugs "robs from other forms of care such as job training and shelter programmes."
But Dr Graham Emslie, who helped develop the Texas project, defends screening: "There are good data showing that if you identify kids at an earlier age who are aggressive, you can intervene... and change their trajectory."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell them NO on Resolution 27
Senator Trudi Schmidt TRUDI@IN-TCH.COM
Commitee members:
billtash@msn.com, COONEYEMAIL@AOL.COM, COREYSTAPLETON@BRESNAN.NET, CWILLIAMS@MONTANADSL.NET, DAVEEW@GMAIL.COM, DAVELEWISD@AOL.COM, GALLUS@AWARE-INC.ORG, GBARKUS@DADCO.COM, HANSEN_KENNETH@EMAIL.COM, LLSD22@YAHOO.COM, r_hawks@imt.net, RICKLAIBLE@AOL.COM, SCOBB@MT.GOV, SD50@MONTANA.COM, SENATORJOHN@BRESNAN.NET, SENBALES@WBACCESS.NET
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
St. Cloud Times (Minnesota)
Be wary of TeenScreen legislation
April 03. 2007
If you have not heard about TeenScreen, here is a crash course.
TeenScreen is a program quietly making its way through the state Capitol. Nationwide, it is known as a highly controversial suicide screening program. Essentially, it is a test given to high school students with very vague questions like, “Do you sometimes feel depressed?”
Responses to these questions then lead to psychiatric evaluations, which often leads to prescription drugs.
This is a program with a clear agenda: Put more kids on prescription drugs. Research shows that screening for suicide, while a noble cause, has a less than impressive success rate. Caught in the crossfire are thousands of kids who will suffer the effects of a “false positive” score. According to one study published in the January 2004 edition of the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, for every 16 students correctly identified by TeenScreen, 84 were falsely labeled.
Don’t be fooled by the well-intentioned but misguided efforts of the TeenScreen promoters.
Jason Krueger
Sauk Rapids
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment